Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 04:29
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Microsoft will finally stop bugging Windows users about Edge — but only in Europe - The Verge
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
How does the brain decide "what" thought to attach to a feeling?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
The world needs the United States, but the USA doesn't need the world. Is this true?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Baseball Gameday: 5/31/25 vs. TCU - Oregon State University Athletics
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What are the signs of mild autism in a child?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
When was the first time you suck on a penis?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.